$420k per year saved thanks to global SCR deNOx performance improvement
Systematic monitoring of the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) installation at a coal-fired power plant in Thailand revealed various opportunities for improvement. This led to targeted SCR equipment upgrades as well as the finetuning of a number of operations and maintenance processes to dramatically increase SCR performance. “The case demonstrates the need for a more comprehensive approach to managing SCR performance.”
The 502 MW gross capacity coal-fired boiler, in operation since 2012, is equipped with two parallel high-dust SCR deNOx reactors in a 2+1 layer configuration. The plant’s EPC contractor initially equipped each reactor with two honeycomb catalyst layers. Arrays of sonic horns (five per layer per reactor) were put in place to periodically clean the layers so that they could continue to perform well until end-of-life, defined as a rather limited 16,000 hours operational.
In 2014, the plant operator called upon ReNOx Laborelec to monitor the SCR installation. “It was a wise decision, because we have seen that only a few plants make the most out of their SCR installations,” says ENGIE Laborelec Senior Expert Frédéric Mercier. “An independent investigation could uncover a range of opportunities to improve performance and reduce costs.” “In this case, the first thing we brought under scrutiny was the catalyst layer’s limited established lifetime of only two to three years.
This was clearly based on OEM guidelines, following a theoretical model where the layer’s initial deNOx potential deteriorates fairly rapidly over time until it reaches the minimal potential required for the given primary NOx. But this assumption is generally too conservative.” “According to our experience, catalyst layers are capable of performing well for a much longer period of time, often four or five years, provided they are operated under favorable conditions.”
Addressing design issues
Additional investigations were needed to confirm whether the catalyst replacement cycle could be stretched to save costs. “We needed to get a better view of the actual catalyst state and its performance,” confirms Mercier, “so we carried out detailed SCR inspections during an outage in 2015. Unfortunately, we found that large areas of the catalyst layers were severely plugged. Not only that, the sonic horns were severely plugged too, which is fairly uncommon.” “To fully understand how this had happened, we analyzed the related operations and maintenance data. This revealed several design issues. For example, the choice of honeycomb catalysts and the way they were designed significantly contributed to the plugging issue. And the sonic horns provided insufficient acoustic energy to keep the reactor clean. We therefore launched programs to install custom pluggingresistant plate catalysts and upgrade the sonic horn system.”
The apparent design weaknesses, the ReNOX Laborelec engineers suspected that the poor catalyst performance and reliability also stemmed from unsatisfactory operating conditions. Mercier: “The limited catalyst lifetime surely couldn’t just be due to design issues. So, we carried out air-flow measurements and analyzed the boiler’s combustion data. This revealed significant imbalances in the combustion flow and temperature. For example, there was a big difference between the left and right primary NOx, by as much as twice the good practice guideline.”
“The imbalances identified meant that some SCR areas were being systematically overcharged, raising the required minimal deNOx potential in these areas and thus reducing catalyst lifetime. Once the plant operators understood this, they asked us to optimize the combustion by tuning secondary air flow rates and control loops. The balance is much better now.”
Adjusting to the changed coal mix
Note that operating conditions must be closely monitored on a permanent basis. “Any change in the plant’s process can significantly impact the catalyst,” says Mercier. “For example, in 2016 we learned that the plant’s coal mix source had changed, making for increased ash, sodium, potassium and sulfur concentrations. Our analysis showed that this increased boiler slagging and fouling and resulted in higher temperatures at the catalyst layers, leading to more rapid degradation. We therefore advised that the boiler cleaning program should be improved and intensified accordingly.”
Tuning NH3 injection
ReNOx Laborelec also analyzed and improved the operation of the SCR reactors themselves. “Note that a sufficient quantity of NH3 should be injected in all the catalyst areas to allow maximum completion of the NOx + NH3 >>> N2 + H2O reaction,” explains Mercier. “Our measurements showed that there was a problem.”
“We analyzed the NOx distribution at the reactor outlets and found that there were areas with low NH3 injection but high NOx, as well as areas with high NH3 injection but low NOx. Both negatively impact performance: the first leads to incomplete deNOx, the other produces performance-degrading NH3 slip. We, therefore, tuned the ammonia injection grid of both reactors to achieve a more even distribution and better equilibrium between the open and closed control valves.”